As I wrote a year ago, the Southport massacre was checkmate for the multiculturalists:
“Southport is the end of the line for me, I’m afraid. I refuse to play this game any longer. So “No” Prime Minister Starmer, you do not speak for me – I am not remotely ‘shocked’ that the caravan of mass slaughter has made an unscheduled stop in Southport. “Au contraire”, your Majesties, I do not find it difficult to ‘imagine what the families, friends and loved ones are going through’ (and doubtless, given time neither will the rest of you). And it’s “Uh-uh” to you too, Home Secretary Cooper, my ‘thoughts and prayers’ already have a prior engagement; resigned to the hope that the ‘refugees welcome’ conniving bastards like you are one day held accountable for the blood on your hands. I’m sick of it all, but mostly I’m sick of the innocent picking up the bar-tab for the multicultural piss-up they were denied entry to.”
A year ago, I thought the situation couldn’t possibly get any worse. But then, like many frustrated Cassandras, it’s difficult to be sufficiently doom-mongering about the Starmer administration – a government whose Midas-like 174-seat majority, stills winds up turning everything to shit.
Announcing a public inquiry at the start of this year, Keir Starmer promised that Southport would be “a line in the sand” and that “nothing would be off the table”. And yet, the current situation is, unthinkably, worse. Under Starmer’s watch, from January to June 2025 there were around 20,000 small boat crossings – the highest ever number for this period, and 48% more than the same period in 2024. Meanwhile, thousands of Afghans have been secretly smuggled to Britain (some of them undoubtedly jihadists), after concerns for their safety following a Ministry of Defence data leak. Not to worry, says the Taliban, we’ll come and kill them over there. Keir Starmer may have been a human rights lawyer, but the human rights of British people, clearly, do not feature heavily in his statute book.
The fact is whatever he says publicly, Starmer is simply not interested in stopping the boats, smashing the gangs or slowing the stab-rate. He’d much rather prevent the public from noticing, and severely punishes anyone who does. As a case in point, consider the dystopian wet dream that is the Online Safety Act – sold as the protection of children. Consider the irony of that for a moment. Not only does the Act criminalise any false statement that causes “non-trivial psychological harm” – effectively the end of comedy, it means content critical of government immigration policy can and is being censored. The real joke of course, is that any child old enough to be gang-raped in a Labour constituency of their choice, will need about 10 seconds to circumvent these draconian restrictions.
As for the two-tier justice that Starmer et al always deny, it’s painfully obvious to anyone with a braincell that the British are second-class citizens in their own homeland. A great illustration of that is the juxtaposition of the Manchester Airport attack and the Southport riots, which occurred within days of each other. A year on, and Judge Neil Flewitt still hasn’t managed to persuade the jury that the Manchester attackers (brothers Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad) ought to get anything more than a smack on the wrist, after inflicting a “high level of violence” on the Greater Manchester Police officers.
Indeed, the Judge seemed unusually determined to address the jury on the nature of the defendants’ ‘good character’, noting that they had no previous convictions:
“Although good character is not a defence to any of the charges faced by the defendants, it is relevant in two ways. Firstly, as the defendants have given evidence, their good character is a positive feature which you should take into account in their favour when considering whether you accept what they told you.
Secondly, the fact that the defendants have not offended in the past, either before or since July 23, 2024, may make it less likely that they acted as the prosecution allege in this case.
It is for you to decide how much importance you attach to the defendants’ good character and it is for you to decide the extent to which it assists on the facts of this particular case. In making those decisions you should take into account everything that you have heard about them, including the unchallenged testimonials that were read on their behalf.”
It is worth noting that Flewitt had no such qualms regarding ‘good character’ or a lack of previous convictions, when sentencing many of the Southport rioters in double-quick time last year.
A week on from the Manchester attack, Axel Rudakubana committed what Sir Adrian Fulford, chair of the Southport public inquiry, called “one of the most egregious crimes in our country’s history.” It’s worth pointing that out, because if you read any of the sanitised, cut and paste tweets from prominent Labour politicians yesterday, you might not have realised what they were talking about.
This was Keir Starmer’s pathetic attempt:
Not a single mention of Rudakubana, murder, terrorism or the ideology that inspired it.
Angela Rayner’s was no better, but then this was the woman famously filmed begging for Muslim votes:
Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper’s heart clearly wasn’t in it, as she barely managed four lines:
“We stand together in grief”, “all those whose lives were changed forever”, “A year since Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe were taken from us” – this passivity amounts to little more than gaslighting. Such poetry miraculously dries up, when it’s time to admonish the ‘far-right’ – those so extreme, they object to the mass slaughter of little girls. In the case of the Southport riots, Starmer’s words suddenly renewed their vigour: “violent disorder” committed by a “tiny, mindless minority” of “far-right thugs”.
Government incompetence on this scale tests the limits of credulity, even for a dullard like Starmer. Such incompetence only ever working one way however, leads to one inescapable conclusion: it’s deliberate. If only Lucy Connolly had had the sense to wear a hijab and merely chinned a policewoman instead of tweeting, no doubt she’d still be out on bail!
Never before has a British government openly displayed such utter contempt for the electorate. The Labour Party clearly hates the public it claims to ‘serve’, and its only plan appears to be the appeasement of Islam until the British are so far eradicated, they can no longer muster a response.
This, however, would be a grave mistake. Starmer may not have liked the Southport riots, but he ain’t seen nothing yet. Britain as it stand is a tinderbox. All it needs is the merest spark to set it off.
Frank Haviland is the author of Banalysis: The Lie Destroying the West and The Frank Report, which you should probably subscribe to.
If you enjoy The New Conservative and would like to support our work, please consider buying us a coffee – it would really help to keep us going. Thank you!
The Starmer CUNT has never spoken for me I am shocked that he has not been assassinated yet and as for those bitches Rayner,Cooper and Reeves they all warrant a hideously painful death.
I have almost reached the stage, where as you say, I can ‘no longer muster a response’. To me it has long been obvious that what Starmer and his coven are doing is deliberate. Those who say ‘he is out of his depth’, ‘he is incompetent’, ‘he is like a rabbit in the headlights’ – as though poor thing, we should give him a break, after all he has only been at it a year, he will ‘learn on the job’, are living in cloud cuckoo land, with their fingers in their ears going ‘la la la’. It has been almost as though a large proportion of the population can’t get to grips with the idea that ‘their betters’ are in fact evil and malevolent, and are lying and gaslighting us, knowing we can’t do a damn thing about it. ‘We’re British, of course we can’t do anything, well, rebellious’. So we sleepwalk meekly towards disaster, wondering ‘is it me?’ It is ever so slightly comforting to lately see the degree of loathing, rage and increasing realisation that they are all disgusting and shameless liars, with evil in their hearts, except…we still can’t do anything about it but rage and express our frustration and hatred. Sometimes it feels as though the stress and misery is so bad, so exhausting, you wonder whether it’s worth the bother. I feel, all the time, that I am waiting for something really bad to happen, and fear that when it does I will be too worn down to fight it. Is this their plan, and if so, then what?
Pingback: Less Porn, More Crime? - The New Conservative