Hull City Council has approved the next phase of its district heating network, a low-carbon vision involving miles of pipes, years of roadworks, and a touching faith in the idea that everything will somehow work out in the end. Phase 1B has been waved through before Phase 1A is even up and running, which suggests either heroic confidence or the sort of institutional arrogance that makes stopping to ask awkward questions forbidden.
The plan, we are told, will save an estimated 110,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide over 40 years (that is equivalent to 22,000 elephants for those who think visually). This figure, like all such figures, arrives fully formed and curiously immune to interrogation. Meanwhile the people of Hull brace themselves for trenches, partial closures, narrowed footways, and the gentle suggestion that motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists may experience ‘delay’. If those delays are anything like the ones we are experiencing under the current phase, then ‘gridlock’ would be a more appropriate word. The low carbon project takes place over and above copious roadwork projects to ‘improve’ traffic flow, keep the water flowing in our drainage system and assorted transport related fuckaboutery.
Phase 1B alone will see roads across large swathes of the city dug up: Ferensway, Prospect Street, Lowgate, Carr Lane, Myton Street, and even Drypool Bridge (you have to live here to know how significant these roads are). Anyone familiar with Hull’s geography, or its weather, may reasonably wonder whether turning the city centre into a network of excavations is quite the bold stroke of climate leadership it is being sold as.
What makes this exercise especially reassuring is that the Environment Agency itself objected. Its concern was not ideological but practical: digging near the River Hull and its flood defences risks compromising their integrity and increasing flood risk. In a city already intimately acquainted with flooding, this might have merited some pause for thought.
Hull floods. Hull has flood defences. Therefore, Hull City Council should dig next to them extensively. Perhaps any flooding will be described as a low-carbon alternative: hydroelectric.
Then there is the question of land use. One of the project’s showpieces is a prime city-centre site, adjacent to Hull College, once part of the lively suburb of Trippett. After over-enthusiastic slum clearance, it became, like so much of Hull – an underused car park. Here, much-needed housing could have been built, for local people, or even for the council’s own overflow accommodation needs; created by the massive influx of migrants, refugees and other scroungers who currently inhabit the massive hotel next to the station – about as near to the centre of the city as it is possible to get. Instead, this land has been commandeered for a power station: still, as of today, an incomplete skeleton of girders.
The sequencing of all this remains baffling. Is it normal to approve later phases of a major infrastructure project before earlier ones have demonstrated that they work? Perhaps this is merely the modern way: implementation first, evaluation later, accountability never.
Equally intriguing is the energy source. The network relies on waste, including incineration, to generate heat; a detail that sits awkwardly alongside relentless exhortations to recycle more, waste less, and aspire to a near-zero-waste future. It is also not clear how the waste we plebians generate at household level will end up in the incinerator. Presumably, the waste we fill the growing range of multicoloured bins that festoon our streets with, will have to be transported to a sorting plant and then the stuff that burns transported back to the incinerator. Hardly a low-carbon process, given the number of lorries that will be required.
Meanwhile, the city’s finances are treated with the same breezy optimism. The revamp of nearby Queen’s Gardens has drifted past £24 million and counting. What was once a well-loved green oasis has been repeatedly dug up to accommodate elements of the still incomplete and untested heating network.
Curiously, this network is not available to the many residential conversions in the city centre or Old Town. Instead, it appears to primarily serve Hull City Council’s own offices.
None of this is to say that low-carbon heating projects are inherently foolish. They can work, but only under specific conditions: suitable buildings, high-quality installation, realistic costings and informed users.
Hull’s scheme bears the hallmarks of the opposite approach. The benefits are long-term and theoretical; the costs are immediate and physical. Roads are dug up now. Businesses lose footfall now. Residents endure noise, dust, diversions, and uncertainty… now.
The Hulligans are two local residents – and TNC columnists – who wish to remain anonymous. We live under the watchful eye of Humberside Police, famous for introducing the oxymoron ‘non-crime hate incident’ into the lexicon.
If you enjoy The New Conservative and would like to support our work, please consider buying us a coffee – it would really help to keep us going. Thank you!
A thought and an observation:
One of HCC’s main buildings ‘The Treasury’ a 1980s modern office block adjacent to Queens Gardens already has approval for a several £M retrofit ‘improvement’ – what’s the betting that all other buildings that want to ‘benefit’ from this local authority overreach heating initiative will be found to require similar?
Hull’s LibDems and Labour diehards believe 100% in anything the right type of ‘experts’ tell them. Ask why the River Hull now has wide banks of grass covered silt in the city centre, when up to the 80s it was a wide barge thronged waterway, and the reason why ‘experts’ say dredging is undesirable is ludicrous to anyone who remembers the 1980s or before but not to our current ‘betters’ who blindly believe.
Last time I visited Hull (The Deep … never again! Parking was extortionate robbing bastards!)) they’d closed the flyover in the town centre near the old Hull nick. What a bloody nightmare trying to get OUT of Hull!
“110,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide over 40 years” Hang on! That is under 3000 tons (even tonnes) per year. That is about the current annual average for 600-700 people in the UK.
If you send the illegal immigrants back to where they came from, you would save more emissions and avoid all the upheaval and costs of the scheme. And have a safer environment with lower taxes.
Govt, local and central, is completely mad. Or evil. Probably both.
PS. For the record, I do not believe in the great Net Zero hoax the Conservatives foisted on us and Labour are doubling down on. I worked on this issue 35 years ago, I know the ins and outs of the possibilities, the shakiness of the conclusions and pointlessness of a country having a net zero target. I pointed all these things out at the time but I was a lone voice in the mad rush to get govt funding. And so a new industry was created – the climate hysteria industry – which is still thriving despite the fact it is built on hot air.