The New Conservative

Margaret Thatcher

Conservatism

When the Labour Party chose Jeremy Corbyn as its leader, Peter Hitchens wrote an article for the Daily Mail asking whether the Conservative Party could choose a true conservative leader now that the Labour Party had a true socialist as theirs. What the Conservatives had as prime minister during Corbyn’s party leadership were three leaders who are best defined as neo-liberals: David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson. Now that the Conservatives have fallen to their worst electoral defeat in history, there is much discussion in the party about getting back to their conservative roots. So, what exactly is a conservative?

Dominic Wightman’s intelligent and original examination of what conservatism is has thus arrived propitiously.

pastedGraphic.png

Wightman begins with an anecdote that encapsulates his argument well. He writes of his ‘battered, brown leather Chesterfield wingback armchair’ in which he likes to sit, sipping lemon green tea. It is a chair that he admits ought to be thrown out, but because he associates it with cherished and significant memories, he does not and so the home help continues to vacuum and polish it. The chair also still supports him. It is not a useless chair. Conservatism in part is that worldview. Things are conserved not because of an unemotional and utilitarian cost analysis but because of what Wightman calls ‘subjective rationality’. At the heart of that is an individual’s love for something, such as a chair, and the desire to keep it regardless of what modernisers and progressives might say. But conservatism is more than that and Wightman unfolds his vision of what it is in the following chapters with exceptional style and lucidity.

Wightman assures us that conservatism does not mean no change, but like the natural world whose seasons turn slowly, conservatives believe that slow, thoughtful change is the best way to make sound and lasting progress. He contrasts them with socialists and liberals who are in a rush to remake the world completely and who change things for progress’ sake. Their perspective is only to look forwards. But we only have to look at all the failed revolutions and reforming programmes that litter the junkyard of history to see that Wightman is right. Conservatism, on the other hand, does not disdain and neglect the past, but regards it as the only true foundation on which a future can be built. What has been done before is a guide to what ought to come next.

Conservatism is not only a style of progress whose tempo is wisely slow and reflective, but for Wightman, has distinct philosophies and policies which he summarises with the acronym CONSERVATIVE for easy recall:

  • C – Capitalism
  • O – Order
  • N – Nation State
  • S – Small State
  • E – Environment
  • R – Reform
  • V – Values
  • A – Aesthetic Appreciation
  • T – Tax Responsibility
  • I – Individual Liberties
  • S – Secularism
  • M – Military Strength

Some of these terms are self-explanatory; some are not. Wightman helpfully defines them all. Values are perhaps the hardest to envisage and again Wightman uses a mnemonic to do this using the word PROVEN:

  • P – Prudence, Property, Prescription
  • R – Rights, Rural, Restraints
  • O – Objectivity, Obligation, Open-mindedness
  • V – Verity, Validity, Veracity
  • E – Equity, Errancy, Empathy
  • N – Nerve, Nature, Nonconformity

The idea here is that these values have proven to be fundamental to civilisation and conservatives who rely on past ages’ wisdom ought to use them as a guide to present and future ethical matters.

If anyone needs a handily brief definition for a rapidly moving debate with conservatism’s opponents, Wightman provides that too: “Honest, effective progress built on past soundness. So, in what ways are you not a conservative?”

If Wightman’s book had ended there, it would have still made a solid contribution to resolving some of the present confusion over what it means to be a conservative. But the text continues for another twenty-three chapters packed with insights as to what it means to be a conservative now. Space does not permit me to explore the wealth of ideas that Wightman presents. There is one feature of the book that I do wish to draw the reader’s attention to and that is what Wightman intriguingly calls ‘Banzai Conservativism’ and which is the subject of chapter thirteen. This is a conservative approach I have never come across before and is one of the most original aspects of Wightman’s book.

Banzai Conservatism is the defence of society against communist revolution, hard left progressivism and the threat of theocratic absolutism. Banzai was the battle cry of Japanese infantrymen in the Second World War as they charged their enemy. It is the tactic of last resort for conservatives. It is non-violent, but it requires a focus analogous to that of an attacking army. It calls for infiltration of extreme progressive groups, seeks popular support from the grassroots up and aims to win the culture war. Wightman’s point is that conservatives can no longer be so phlegmatic about the political and social threat posed by liberal-left authoritarians and religious fundamentalists. His book is a rallying cry to all who seek to preserve what is best about Britain, or any nation, to become conservative activists. As cultural Marxism continues to infect Western minds and corrupt institutions at an alarming rate, Wightman’s book could not have been timelier.

 

Conservatism by Dominic Wightman, published by Hayek Publishing is available to buy on Amazon.

Peter Harris is the author of two books, The Rage Against the Light: Why Christopher Hitchens Was Wrong (2019) and Do You Believe It? A Guide to a Reasonable Christian Faith (2020).

If you enjoy The New Conservative and would like to support our work, please consider buying us a coffee – it would really help to keep us going. Thank you!

Please follow and like us:

6 thoughts on “Conservatism”

    1. Reform have just recruited member numbers exceeding the wretched fake Tory Party. The battle is on and I for one am not going to be found wanting.

      Do not go gentle into that good night.

      Do not go gentle into that good night,
      Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
      Because their words had forked no lightning they
      Do not go gentle into that good night.

      Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
      Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
      And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
      Do not go gentle into that good night.

      Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
      Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

      And you, my father, there on the sad height,
      Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
      Do not go gentle into that good night.
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.[7]

  1. I think it is taxation that is the key to change. End it and everything that happens will be at a slower pace because people will only contribute to major projects if they see some advantage. Everything will slow down and be better for it.

  2. All well and good, but no current or aspirant (who is deemed acceptable for adoption) conservative MP now has knowledge of, understanding or even affiliation with these highlighted things. It’s over and time to hope (probably in vain) that a new party (not Reform) will arise.

    1. IMHO ReformUK is the last chance to save Conservatism. The Conservative Party sold its soul long ago and deserves to be left in the gutter where it truly belongs. Reform UK does not tick all the hallmarks of Conservatism as set out in the article but it’s as near as we are going to get at five minutes to twelve. Yes, I too have some niggling doubts about Farage but we have just formed our Reform branch in our constituency and I am surprised at the number of 30 to 40 year olds coming forward to volunteer their help in campaigning. Farage in my opinion will give his all as long as he senses the current momentum continues to grow and electoral success follows.

  3. Hi there! I just finished reading your post, and I wanted to say how much I enjoyed it! You’ve highlighted some key points that often don’t get enough attention, and I found the way you explained everything particularly helpful. It’s definitely a topic that resonates with me, and I’m sure others will benefit from your insights too. I’ve been writing about a similar topic on my own site, where I dive into [mention relevant subject]. I’d love to hear your thoughts on it! Thanks again for sharing such valuable content. Keep up the fantastic work!

Leave a Reply