The Intellectual Drivers of Demographic Replacement

In the infamous words of Tony Blair’s advisor Andrew Neather, mass immigration policy was ‘rubbing the Right’s nose in diversity’. The New Labour government was determined to smash traditional society, and the wrecking ball has been swinging ever since. The country has become almost unrecognisable to how it looked before the end of last century, due to a relentless influx from Africa and Asia.

Two and two do not add up to four, because while there are more of ‘them’, there are also less of ‘us’. Nobody is being removed from their homeland to let immigrants take their place, thus the ‘great replacement’ must be a delusional conspiracy theory. Yet anyone who is not wilfully blind can see that vast swaths of our cities have undergone an urban clearance of the indigenous. And ordinary white Britons are not merely being pushed out (‘white flight’); they are subjected to ideological forces that threaten their survival.

Many schools in cities such as Birmingham have not a single white British pupil, and the ethnic explosion is happening across the land. Two weeks ago a rally against uncontrolled immigration was held in Glasgow, and although the counter-protestors got all the positive media coverage, five hundred concerned citizens had the courage to take a stand. Glasgow is changing dramatically; it is now like multicultural Manchester was two decades ago, and catching up fast.

If this is all happening by accident, there is certainly no institutional effort to stop it. On the evidence of word spoken and pacts made by the powers-that-be, the rapid transformation from a predominantly white Christian country to a morass of foreign cultures is the desired outcome. From the rainbow of different races and religions, one is likely to outgrow the others (Britain is projected to have a Muslim majority before this century ends).  Islam is the sword that will destroy our Christian heritage.

But why would our rulers want this? Let us consider the intellectual drivers, or the four Cs,of radical demographic change: Cultural Marxism, Coudenhove-Kalergi’s vision, the Cloward-Pliven strategy and Common Purpose training.

Cultural Marxism

The West, whether its bemused or apathetic populace realises it or not, is undergoing a cultural revolution. The shrill demands of Woke warriors are at the vanguard of a strategy that began a hundred years ago, at the Institut für Sozialforschung in Frankfurt, where Marxist professors realised that nothing really changes unless the culture changes. Cultural Marxism deviated from the economic determinism of Karl Marx, using Freudian analytical concepts to undermine the false consciousness that reinforces social structures. The targets may be summarised as faith, flag and family – the foundational elements of our culture that maintain order, morality and belonging.

Critical theorists of the Frankfurt School, being Jewish, fled the Third Reich in the 1930s and many emigrated to the USA (notably Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse). From radical departments at Columbia University and other leftist institutes, Cultural Marxist ideology was gradually introduced to American academic and political discourse, but it was masked by the progressive terminology of ‘equality’ or ‘diversity’. As Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, advised: –

‘True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.

Globalist pushers of the ‘Great Reset’ exploit Cultural Marxism as a tried-and tested method to divide and rule. .

Coudenhove-Kalergi

In the same way that they refute the ‘Great Reset’ as merely a book written by Klaus Schwab on revitalising the global economy after Covid-19, fact-checkers claim that the ‘Kalergi Plan’ is a far-right conspiracy theory. Austrian aristocrat Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote a book, but not an official policy for demographic replacement. Move along now, nothing to see here.

In his Practical Idealism (1923), Coudenhove-Kalergi envisaged the future of Europe as unified, borderless, and an ethnic melting pot. Or did he? The text has often been distorted or taken out of context. As Practical Idealism is only available in German, I consulted a fellow writer and fluent German speaker, who owns a copy. The truth is that Coudenhove-Kalergi described a racial hierarchy, with white Europeans cast as intelligent but cold (befitting their climate), Africans as less smart but warmer, and Jews and Chinese having the ideal character and intellect. The latter would form a new nobility.

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a highly influential figure. He was first president of the Council of Europe, inaugural winner of the Charlemagne Prize in 1950, and proposer of Beethoven’s Ode to Joy as the European anthem. Fast forward to today, and Europe is certainly changing as Coudenhove-Kalergi predicted, with mass immigration and media promotion of biracial coupling. The exponential rise in arrivals from Africa and Asia was simultaneous to the elevation of the European Economic Community to EU superstate, and consequent dismantling of sovereignty and border control.

Governments have little power ro enforce borders since the UN Migration Pact (signed in 2018 by prime minister Theresa May), which was the culmination of work by Peter Sutherland, the globalist and Goldman-Sachs executive appointed as the UN special representative for migration. Sutherland, who urged the EU to dilute national homogeneity through mass immigration, brought Coudenhove-Kalergi’s dream to reality.

Cloward-Pliven strategy

The massive fiscal debt of Western governments is the planned result of radical ideology. In 1966 two sociologists at Columbia University devised a strategy to wreck the social welfare system in the USA, purportedly to create an egalitarian society. Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Pliven were political activists inspired by Alinsky, the militant Chicago professor.

The Cloward-Pliven strategy entails deliberately overwhelming what they perceived as parsimonious federal assistance programmes. The ensuing social and economic chaos would lead to federal intervention in the form of a guaranteed income. The idea was pushed in the Democrat Party, where it fitted the nurturing of dependent client groups. The vehicle for the intended systemic breakdown is mass immigration from poorer regions.  Currently half of Muslim adults in the UK are not paying income tax and are therefore net recipients of public money. But the millions who work in cheap labour – white, black or brown – will soon be made redundant by AI and automation, relegating their status to ‘useless eaters’ living on state handouts. .

Facilitated by a digital currency, basic universal income will ensure total dependence on the state. In this ultimate form of control, the historical determinism of two obscure Marxists is being realised. Smashing everything to instil a new world order is the means-to-an-end method of oligarch George Soros, who is bent on destroying the nation state, using Muslims and other immigrants as foot-soldiers. . .

Common Purpose

Most of the ruling class in Western society would not describe themselves as Marxist; instead they cloak themselves in the virtuous terms of ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’ and ‘inclusive’. Since the 1960s they gathered strength and marched through the institutions of education, media, politics, healthcare, law, policing, armed services, the arts, advertising industry and commercial headquarters. From the civil service to the Church of England, a new establishment has been forged. Nobody prospers unless they express the warped values of progressivism (i.e. Woke).

Common Purpose is a shadowy international organisation that trains leaders to work across boundaries and to ‘lead beyond authority’, thus bypassing due process and democracy. It selects trainees with a proclivity for challenging tradition and social norms. The training features neurolinguistic programming, which uses language as a tool to rewire thinking and mould consensus. Common Purpose would not identify itself as Cultural Marxist, but it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The senior ranks of the police are dominated by Common Purpose alumni; explaining the often controversial stances taken by forces in policing favourably for ethnic minorities and against the ordinary people.

To conclude, demographic replacement is a trahison des clercs. The government and civil service are the people trafficking gangs. I understand that a rally against mass immigration will be held on 26^th October, led by Tommy Robinson. This is convenient for the authorities, who will smear and compartmentalise opposition to open borders as ‘far right’. A large counter-protest organised by the trade unions and student unions will chant ‘refugees are welcome here’, holding anti-racist placards. Media coverage will suggest that they, and our great leader Sir Keir Starmer, are on the right side of history.  You don’t need me to tell you who the Metropolitan Police will be apprehending.

Niall McCrae is the author of ‘Green in Tooth and Claw: the Misanthropic Mission of Climate Alarm’ (2024).

If you enjoy The New Conservative and would like to support our work, please consider buying us a coffee – it would really help to keep us going. Thank you!

Please follow and like us: